February
2010 Newsletter
H-1B PRACTICE AND THOUGHTS
February 12, 2010
By Robert D. Aronson
DEAR CLIENTS AND FRIENDS:
Each year starting in early March, our office
becomes progressively more fixated on H-1B filings. The pace
of our activity reaches a crescendo of frenzied activity culminating
in the submission of batches of new H-1B Petitions on the evening
of March 31 so that the fruits of our labors are received at
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) precisely on
April 1. Our work, particularly in the final run-up to this filing
deadline, ultimately takes on the same quickened and purposeful
pace as prospectors staking out claims during the Oklahoma Land
Rush; or the jostling bread lines in Soviet Russia; or shoppers
bounding into a Best Buy store to snarf up a new Nintendo Wii
at discounted prices at the after-Thanksgiving sales – that
is, there is a need for timeliness, promptness, resoluteness,
accuracy, and advocacy.
Given that we are now approaching this year’s
round of H-1B filings, I wish to dedicate this Newsletter to
a discussion of H-1B practice as it will unfold in the coming
weeks.
BUSINESS AT THE SPEED OF
LIGHT/
H-1Bs ARE THE VOICE OF THE TURTLE
If you ask just about anyone what it takes for
a business to be successful in this high-speed digital age, I
would bet that the answers would come out pretty much the same.
Business success requires speed, suppleness, flexibility, fast
reactions to the marketplace, and high innovation. Plodding manufacturing
giants or mammoth service organizations have been superseded
as business models by upstart companies founded on a dream and
a vision that not only respond to but in large measure create
and mold our modern day consumer culture.
Running diametrically opposed to this sleek, fast-paced
business model is a creaking, ossified business immigration system.
Nowhere is the contrast more evident between legitimate, vital
business needs and an unresponsive immigration system than in
the steady erosion of H-1B availability to U.S. business interests
that need to hire the best and brightest foreign professionals.
Just to review, the H-1B Temporary Worker classification
is a temporary, nonimmigrant visa classification that is widely
used by the U.S. business community to recruit foreign professionals.
Historically, a U.S. employer in a relatively short lead time
could qualify a foreign professional - many of whom possess professional
skills critical to business success – for a relatively
generous period of employment authorization, running up to six
years. There is a numerical quota (that is, a limit) of 65,000
H-1B numbers available each year with an additional 20,000 H-1B
visa numbers available to foreign professionals who hold Master’s
Degrees or above from U.S. universities, although as discussed
below, there are certain situations that are entirely exempted
from the H-1B quota.
We are now rapidly approaching April 1, which is
the “launch date” for filing H-1B Petitions that
are cap-subject – that is, subject to the H-1B quota. In
previous years when the economy was growing robustly and there
was a voracious corporate appetite for talented professional
personnel regardless of their nationality, the competition for
these numbers was fierce and the entire H-1B quota allotment
would be used up instantaneously on the first day. Then last
year owing to the confluence of the economic slowdown, a sharp
curtailment in hiring decisions, and a rise in U.S. unemployment,
the H-1B numbers lingered until December 21, 2009. But in either
scenario, the H-1B numerical allotment will become exhausted.
Let me deal in the balance of this Newsletter with
some essential considerations now affecting H-1B hiring decisions.
STEP #1:
IS THE H-1B SUBJECT TO THE QUOTA?
Not all H-1B Petitions are subject to the quota.
But if a case is subject to the quota, an employer is then forced
to engage in a race against time to file the matter prior to
the exhaustion of the H-1B numbers.
Therefore, the initial consideration is the following:
Is the proposed H-1B Petition subject to the H-1B quota, which,
in turn, will require that the H-1B Petition be filed in an allowable
window of time running from April 1 to the date on which the
H-1B numbers are exhausted?
Let’s begin by describing the types of cases
that are exempt from the H-1B quota and therefore can be filed
and approved at any point in time. The exempted H-1B situations
basically fall within two broad paradigmatic classes:
1. Certain types of employers are exempted
from the H-1B quota.
· Universities (technically, not-for-profit “institutions of higher
education”)
· Employers that are both nonprofit and
affiliated with an institution of higher education (such as a
teaching hospital)
· Governmental or nonprofit research organizations
2. Some activities of a foreign national result
in H-1B cap-exemption.
· H-1B extensions provided that the initial H-1B Petition was subject
to the H-1B quota
· If the foreign professional had been counted
against the quota within the past six years
J-1 physicians who have received waivers through
Interested Government Agencies
· Joint appointments where part of the employment
is for a cap-exempt employer
· Foreign professionals who are working
AT (although not necessarily for) an exempt organization (usually,
a university or a nonprofit university affiliated entity)
All other H-1B requests fall subject to the quota
so as to require the availability of an H-1B number in order
to approve the case. So, let’s take a look at considerations
pertaining to this line of cases.
STEP #2:
IF SUBJECT TO THE H-1B CAP, THEN WHAT?
Here are the givens if a case is subject to the
H-1B quota:
1. The H-1B case can be filed
starting on April 1;
2. If approved, the foreign national
can actually start working in the position in H-1B
status on October 1;
3. H-1B filings will be accepted
until the H-1B numbers are exhausted;
4. The H-1B numbers will probably
not be ravenously depleted, but should remain available
for some unknown period of time;
5. At some point though, the numbers
will likely become exhausted; and
6. Given the uncertainty as to when
the numbers will disappear, it still makes sense
for employers to make prompt hiring decisions so
as to file their H-1B Petitions in cap-subject cases
as soon as possible while the H-1B numbers last.
There are three (3) steps involved in the H-1B
filing process:
1. Obtaining a “Prevailing
Wage Determination” since a cornerstone principle for H-1B
purposes is that the wages (as well as the overall terms of employment)
need to be fair and fully competitive with U.S. workers.
2. Filing a Labor Condition Application
to the U.S. Department of Labor so as to establish
that the H-1B professional will be employed under acceptable,
competitive wage and working conditions; and
3. Filing an H-1B Petition to U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) so as
to show that the job is professional and that the H-1B
beneficiary has the appropriate professional credentials
and background for the job.
Traditionally, this filing process went quite quickly
and smoothly. The turnaround time for a Labor Condition Application
was around one day, and then USCIS implemented a program called
Premium Processing through which an employer could get an adjudication
of the H-1B Petition within 15 days. As a consequence, employers
essentially could make last-minute hiring decisions and still
make timely filings of H-1B Petitions.
While the underlying H-1B laws remain the same,
the Department of Labor has instituted the following two (2)
procedural changes that at least thus far have slowed down considerably
the Labor Condition Application/H-1B process:
1. In order to receive a "safe
harbor” prevailing wage determination, effective January
1, 2010, an employer now needs to file its prevailing wage determination
to a centralized federal office that in its opening period of
operation has been terribly slow and unresponsive. Previously,
such prevailing wage determinations were filed with the states,
which not only acted promptly but in most cases would actually
discuss the nuances of a job so as to develop customized and
responsive prevailing wage figures; and
2. There is a new Labor Condition
Application process known as iCERT that centralizes
and all too frequently bottlenecks the process for
receiving approval of a Labor Condition Application.
My point here is that employers can no longer count
on short lead times in order to timely file their H-1B Petitions.
Rather, in order to file in the window of time prior to the exhaustion
of H-1B numbers, employers will need to speed up their H-1B hiring
decisions and then promptly and aggressively go through the Labor
Condition Application filing process. Conversely, employers can
no longer rely on being able to prepare and file an entire H-1B
Petition in a matter of days; rather the initial clearance process
through the Department of Labor alone will likely take a few
weeks, and this vastly increased lead time needs to be factored
into H-1B practice for cap-subject cases.
STEP #3:
EXEMPTING A CASE FROM THE H-1B QUOTA
Given the timing problems with cap-subject H-1B
cases and the inevitability that H-1B numbers will become exhausted,
there certainly are major benefits to qualifying new H-1B cases
for an exemption from the H-1B quota. Some cases by their very
nature will be subject to the quota, such as first-time H-1B
requests by private, for-profit employers. But in many instances,
some steps can be taken that conceivably could remove an H-1B
case from the constraints of the quota.
In many instances, it may be possible to structure
employment positions in a manner that will enable an employer
to obtain H-1B cap-exempt benefits, such as:
• Structuring a joint position in which one
of the employing parties is a university or a non-profit, university
affiliated entity, even if there is only a fairly minimal (although
legitimate) employment commitment (given that the law does not
impose a specific number of hours);
• Even if there is no direct employment relationship, assigning the employee
to regular and recurrent duties on the premises of (that is AT) a university
or a non-profit, university affiliated entity;
• Assigning the employee specific duties and/or a job title (such as an
academic appointment) that would underscore the H-1B employee’s contributions
to the activity that qualifies for an exemption from the H-1B quota;
• Investigating thoroughly any affiliation arrangements that might exist
between university programs and locations at which or for which an H-1B alien
will be working;
• Looking backward in time to determine whether the foreign national held
H-1B status without exhausting the full six-year limit, since that could be used
as the grounds for claiming an exemption from the H-1B quota for the remainder
of the six-year term.
Determining whether a case can be exempted from
the H-1B cap can be a complex legal question that requires an
examination of a range of factors, including: the history of
the individual, the structure of the petitioning employer, the
particular facts, and the nature of the job being offered. So,
it certainly makes eminent sense to thoroughly analyze whether
an H-1B request may qualify for an exemption from the H-1B quota
since that determination impacts not only the time frame in which
a case could be filed, but at some point in time also the likelihood
of its approval.
PRACTICE POINTERS
Frankly, I don’t know of any employer that
affirmatively aspires to serve as an H-1B sponsor much less deal
with the immigration system unless there are real, meaningful
benefits. But ultimately, business success relies on the recruitment
and retention of the best, brightest, and most motivated employees.
In select instances in which foreign professionals fill that
type of need, an employer will need to grapple with our immigration
laws. Our job is to make this immigration process as efficient
as possible and to ensure that an employer’s actions are
compliant with our immigration procedures and laws.
So, here are some thoughts on how to successfully
hire and retain H-1B foreign professionals:
1. Allow Enough Lead Time. Given
the delays and bureaucratic bottlenecks, make hiring decisions
as soon as possible and immediately start the H-1B sponsorship
process. For cap-subject filings, be aware of interim reports
on H-1B visa number utilization since that will suggest the window
of time in which to file the H-1B Petition.
2. Utilize Safe Harbor. An employer
can establish the prevailing wage for H-1B purposes
through alternative wage data. However, in this age
of strong compliance pressures, we strongly recommend
that employers get prevailing wage figures through
the U.S. Department of Labor, since this will provide
enhanced protection from a later collateral attack
for substandard wage figures.
3. Plan then Build. In H-1B practice,
the stakes are pretty high in determining if a case
is subject to or exempt from the cap. While some
cases are quite straightforward, there is considerable
uncertainty in many instances, and the outcome determines
the timing and approach to an H-1B filing. In short,
make sure to figure out at the outset of a case whether
or not the H-1B quota is an issue for concern.
4. Preventive Safe Harbor Filings.
As noted above, getting a safe harbor prevailing
wage determination can be time consuming in a system
that is unforgiving of delays. What employers often
overlook is that it is possible to get a safe harbor
wage at the beginning of a recruitment – that
is, at the time when an employer thinks that it might
hire (or consider) foreign professionals for the
position. In short, prevailing wage determinations
can be banked for a stipulated period of time.
5. Monitor Ongoing H-1B Activity. Think
of H-1B authorization as representing an agreed-upon
arrangement between the employer and the U.S. Government
on the terms and conditions of a foreign professional’s
employment. During the course of the H-1B employment,
an employer may (or may not) have additional filing
obligations in the event that the H-1B employee’s
duties change – such as changes in the worksites,
job duties, salary, job title, etc. In short, keep
up-to-date with job changes and communicate freely
and fully with immigration counsel to figure out
how to keep both you as the employer and your H-1B
employees in full legal compliance.
6. Need for Employment Relationship. Remember:
H-1B approval requires that there is an employer-employee
relationship. Conversely, it does not cover independent
contractor situations in which compensation appears
on Form 1099. The cardinal rule is that an H-1B employee
needs to receive a W-2 from the exact same entity
that filed and gained approval of the H-1B Petition
(although there are some limited exceptions in instances
of corporate restructuring/successor-in-interest
and unified employment positions, particularly if
common paymaster status has been granted).
7. Document H-1B Filings. Given
ongoing suspicions that the H-1B program is riddled
with fraud, the various government agencies recurrently
request strong confirmation of an employer’s
existence, even for large, established companies.
Typical requests would be for the FEIN, pictures
of the employer’s premises, and proof of ongoing
business. These are “grin and bear it” issues,
in my opinion, but it is oftentimes wise to include
this type of documentation at the time of initial
filing.
8. Protect the Dependents. The spouse
and unmarried children to age 21 can qualify for
H-4 dependent status. But it is oftentimes necessary
to affirmatively file for this status. Employers
should take an active role in ensuring that the dependents
of their H-1B employees hold valid immigration status.
There is no more demoralizing, dispiriting situation
(which we at this form unfortunately encounter all
too often) than a family that becomes separated owing
to an oversight in the immigration status of the
dependent family members.
9. Passport Validity Dates. While
H-1B status can normally be granted in three-year
increments, under law, a foreign national needs to
possess a valid passport good for at least six months
beyond the period of nonimmigrant status. This problem
often becomes acute and even dangerous when an H-1B
employee reenters the United States following trips
abroad. There are many instances when a passport’s
validity date is shorter than the period of the approved
H-1B petition, and the foreign professional, unbeknownst
to the company, may be admitted in H-1B status for
a truncated period of time.
10. H-1B Travel Issues. If a foreign
national is already in the United States, H-1B status
is established by the I-94 card affixed in the passport
and there is no need for an H-1B visa stamp. If and
when an H-1B employee travels, however, he/she needs
to have a valid visa in the passport. This leads
to a whole slew of issues concerning the U.S. Consulates
abroad and the inspection process upon return. The
general rule is that an H-1B employee should check
in, even if only briefly, with immigration counsel
to review his/her travel plans and to ensure that
all documentation is in place to allow the travel
to proceed without incident.
As always, please feel free to distribute this
Newsletter to other interested recipients and by all means, please
bring any questions or comments to our attention. It is always
a pleasure to hear from those whom we serve.
Cordially,
ROBERT D. ARONSON
This memorandum
is one of a series of communications prepared as a general
public service to our clients and friends. The information
herein presented is not intended nor should it be utilized
as legal advice on any specific situation. Furthermore, given
the rapid pace of change, the veracity of this information
is constantly subject to modification and/or reversal. Rather,
this piece represents a good faith attempt to orient clients
and other interested parties served by Aronson & Associates
to current immigration developments. This piece in no manner
supercedes the need to seek competent legal advice when engaged
in activities carrying possible immigration-related consequences.
|